From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Scribner

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 4, 2009
CV 06-01715-VBF (SH) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2009)

Opinion


ARMANDO L. MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. LARRY SCRIBNER, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 06-01715-VBF (SH) United States District Court, C.D. California. August 4, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation. The Court concurs with and adopts the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that the Petition filed herein is dismissed with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein by the United States mail on petitioner and counsel for respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Scribner

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 4, 2009
CV 06-01715-VBF (SH) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Martinez v. Scribner

Case Details

Full title:ARMANDO L. MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. LARRY SCRIBNER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Aug 4, 2009

Citations

CV 06-01715-VBF (SH) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2009)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Soto

David's trial counsel was therefore not deficient in failing to request a live lineup subsequent to the first…