Summary
holding that foreseeability is restricted by the purposeful affiliation requirement that defendant "'purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum state'"
Summary of this case from Hamilton v. Accu-TekOpinion
Argued October 20, 1983
Decided November 22, 1983
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, FRANK VACCARO, J.
E. Richard Rimmels, Jr., for third-party plaintiff-appellant.
Alexander V. Sansone for third-party defendant-respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 91 A.D.2d 652). In denying the discovery requested in the answering affidavit, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law.
Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.