From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinelli v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 1, 1985
467 So. 2d 841 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 85-271.

May 1, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Arthur J. Franza, J.

Anthony W. Martinelli, pro se.

No appearance by appellee.


Appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for post conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, appellant alleged that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to discover that "[t]his case was a prime case of entrapment." However, appellant did not comply with Rule 3.850 in that his motion contained no facts which indicated that he may have been entitled to a defense of entrapment, or which otherwise supported his allegation. The other allegations contained in appellant's motion are without merit.

Accordingly, the order denying post conviction relief is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Martinelli v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 1, 1985
467 So. 2d 841 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Martinelli v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY W. MARTINELLI, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 1, 1985

Citations

467 So. 2d 841 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Romano v. State

I would affirm. Gorham v. State, 521 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 1988); Ricco v. State, 474 So.2d 327 (Fla. 4th DCA…

Manley v. State

See also People v. Solomon, 158 Ill. App.3d 432, 110 Ill.Dec. 698, 511 N.E.2d 875, app. den., 117 Ill.2d 552,…