From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Walker

Supreme Court of California
Feb 20, 1882
60 Cal. 94 (Cal. 1882)

Opinion

         Department Two

         Motion to modify the judgment heretofore rendered by the Supreme Court. ( Reported 58 Cal. 590.)

         COUNSEL

          E. S. Lippett and C. V. Grey, for Appellants.

          A. W. Thompson, for Respondents.


         OPINION

         The Court:

         The motion to modify the judgment is denied. We do not see that the defendant can not plead the judgment subsequently recovered in the action brought by plaintiffs against him.


Summaries of

Martin v. Walker

Supreme Court of California
Feb 20, 1882
60 Cal. 94 (Cal. 1882)
Case details for

Martin v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES MARTIN et al. v. L. W. WALKER et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Feb 20, 1882

Citations

60 Cal. 94 (Cal. 1882)

Citing Cases

Keech v. Beatty

) The fact that the other action was commenced after the present suit does not render the first judgment any…