From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 19, 1965
341 F.2d 576 (5th Cir. 1965)

Opinion

No. 21408.

February 19, 1965.

Wayne E. Ripley, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant.

Charles S. Carrere, Asst. U.S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Edward F. Boardman, U.S. Atty., Middle District of Florida, for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, JONES, Circuit Judge, and GROOMS, District Judge.


The principal contentions of the appellant in complaining of his conviction and sentence by the court in a jury-waived case deal with defects in the search warrant. We have considered each of these and find that they are without substance. The original warrant was properly signed by the Commissioner. The fact that the copy that was served on the appellant at his home was signed only by a typewritten signature is immaterial. The time which the officers must wait after making their presence known before making a forcible entry — here, one minute — is a circumstance which the trial court must weigh. We find no error in his determination that the execution of the warrant in this case was legal. United States v. West, 2 Cir., 328 F.2d 16.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Martin v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 19, 1965
341 F.2d 576 (5th Cir. 1965)
Case details for

Martin v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Lenton MARTIN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 19, 1965

Citations

341 F.2d 576 (5th Cir. 1965)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Abrahams

" United States v. McKenzie, 446 F.2d 949, 954 (6th Cir. 1971). See also United States v. Cafero, 473 F.2d…

United States v. Wylie

Indisputably, the officers were "refused admittance" within the meaning of the statute. See, e. g., Masiello…