From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Paisner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 21, 1998
253 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 21, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the defendants Ron Paisner and Lizl Construction Corp.

We decline the third-party defendant's invitation to reconsider our opinion in Morales v. Gross ( 230 A.D.2d 7) that the Omnibus Workers' Compensation Reform Act of 1996 (L 1996, ch 635, §§ 2-9) does not apply retroactively to cases pending at the time of its enactment ( see also, Majewski v. BroadalbinPerth Cent. School Dist., 231 A.D.2d 102, affd 91 N.Y.2d 577).

O'Brien, J.P., Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Martin v. Paisner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 21, 1998
253 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Martin v. Paisner

Case Details

Full title:GREGG MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. RON PAISNER et al., Respondents, and JONAS A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 21, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 502

Citing Cases

O'Connor v. Spencer

However, the appellants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the claims based upon common-law…

Hoelle v. New York Equities Company

In this case, the record establishes that the general contractor had no direct supervision and control over…