From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Martin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 22, 1990
561 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 90-239.

May 22, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Dade County, Mary Ann MacKenzie, J.

Melvyn B. Frumkes Associates, Greene and Greene and Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant.

Wallace, Engels, Pertnoy, Solowsky Allen and Jerome H. Shevin and Dana Corbo, Miami, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and GODERICH, JJ.


The appellant, Ronald J. Martin [husband], appeals a non-final order authorizing the disbursement of funds held as an advance for additional fees and costs in the parties' divorce proceeding. We reverse.

The trial court conducted a hearing in which it awarded the wife attorney's fees and costs. In addition, the trial court ordered the husband to advance additional funds "as and for an advance for additional fees and costs."

A few months later, the wife filed a motion to authorize the disbursement of the funds held as an advance for additional fees and costs. At the hearing, the husband's counsel objected and demanded an evidentiary hearing as to the reasonableness and necessity of the attorney's fees and costs. The trial court took the position that its prior order awarding the advance was the actual award of fees and costs and that an evidentiary hearing was not required prior to disbursing the funds.

Prior to awarding attorney's fees for services already rendered and for costs already incurred, a trial court must hold an evidentiary hearing as to the reasonableness and necessity of the fees and costs awarded. See Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 1985), holding modified sub nom., Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So.2d 828 (Fla. 1990); Grabow v. Grabow, 419 So.2d 340, 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Schorb v. Schorb, 547 So.2d 985, 989 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Nudelman v. Nudelman, 542 So.2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), is not applicable because the proceeding in the present case dealt with an award of attorney's fees for services already rendered and for costs actually incurred and not an award of temporary attorney's fees awardable under Section 61.071, Florida Statutes (1989).

Accordingly, we reverse with directions to the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing as to the reasonableness and necessity of the attorney's fees and costs awarded to the wife.


Summaries of

Martin v. Martin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 22, 1990
561 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Martin v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:RONALD J. MARTIN, APPELLANT, v. JUDITH MARTIN, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 22, 1990

Citations

561 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Rokicki v. Rokicki

The husband argues that under prior law, an award for interim fees must have been corroborated by expert…

Larrauri v. Larrauri

Finally, we reverse the attorney's fee award; the trial court erred in failing to conduct a hearing and to…