From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Eagle Hill Foundation, of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 1985
111 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

May 28, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Orgera, J.).


Order affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

In 1973, the County of Suffolk acquired, for general county purposes, premises known as Coindre Hall. Temporary jurisdiction over the property was assigned to the Suffolk County Department of Parks, Recreation and Conservation in 1974. From the time of its acquisition, the county considered and tried various uses for the property, none of which proved viable, and the premises, including a 60- to 70-room building in a state of disrepair, proved to be a financial drain on the county. On May 28, 1981, the County Legislature adopted Resolution No. 1568-81, authorizing the County Executive to enter into a 25-year lease with defendant Eagle Hill Foundation, Inc., of New York, a not-for-profit corporation devoted to the education of learning-disabled persons. Pursuant to this resolution, such a lease was executed in June 1981. However, the 25-year term of this lease ran afoul of County Law § 215 (4), which provides that "county real property * * * may be leased for a term not exceeding five years". In addition, County Law § 215 (6) provides that "[s]uch property may be sold or leased only to the highest responsible bidder after public advertisement".

By a resolution approved November 2, 1981, the County Legislature adopted Local Laws, 1981, No. 41 of the County of Suffolk, which provides, inter alia, that: "Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 215 (4) of the COUNTY LAW, after a determination by the Suffolk County Legislature that County-owned property is not required for public use, such property may be leased through the Suffolk County Department of Real Estate for a period not exceeding twenty-five (25) years, upon such terms and conditions as may be prescribed by the County Legislature by resolution in the same manner and with the same rights and privileges as if owned by an individual, to a public corporation; to a not-for-profit corporation; or to an association, corporation, or other legal entity which has been granted a charter for educational purposes from the New York State Department of Education". Thereafter, in early 1982, the County Legislature authorized an amendment to the lease for the purpose of providing additional services, and a "re-executed and amended" lease was entered into on October 12, 1982.

We agree with Special Term that not only were the lease term provisions of County Law § 215 (4) superseded by Local Laws, 1981, No. 41 of the County of Suffolk, but that said local law also had the effect of superseding the bidding requirements of County Law § 215 (6) (County Law § 2 [b]). Although the local law did not specifically state that it was intended to supersede County Law § 215 (6), the failure to so state did not "affect the validity of such local law" (Municipal Home Rule Law § 22). The superseding of the bidding requirements was a necessary corollary to the legislative objective of authorizing leases "upon such terms and conditions as may be prescribed by the County Legislature * * * in the same manner and with the same rights and privileges as if owned by an individual * * * to a not-for-profit corporation" ( see, Matter of Woll v. Erie County Legislature, 83 A.D.2d 792). We further find that the County Legislature fully complied with the provisions of Local Laws, 1981, No. 41 of the County of Suffolk and that the amended lease was validly authorized by the 1982 resolution. Additionally, there is no basis in the record for plaintiff's contention that the property had been dedicated as park land.

The judgment to be entered upon the order appealed from should declare the rights of the parties in accordance herewith ( see, Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, 334, appeal dismissed 371 U.S. 74, cert denied 371 U.S. 901; Holliswood Care Center v. Whalen, 58 N.Y.2d 1001, 1004). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Martin v. Eagle Hill Foundation, of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 1985
111 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Martin v. Eagle Hill Foundation, of New York

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MARTIN, Appellant, v. EAGLE HILL FOUNDATION, INC., OF NEW YORK, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 28, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Lawrence v. County of Greene

It is well settled that any conflicts between the provisions of the County Law and any local law or…

Guzman v. Westchester Cnty. Bd. of Legislature

Hence, "any conflicts between the provisions of the County Law and any local law or administrative code shall…