From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Continental Investors

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
May 10, 1991
934 F.2d 1265 (11th Cir. 1991)

Summary

awarding costs for statute of limitations research and briefing and approving assessment of costs and expenses related to motion for voluntary dismissal if such motion were granted

Summary of this case from Brown v. Boeing Co.

Opinion

No. 90-7811.

May 10, 1991.

S.D.Ala., 749 F.Supp. 242.


DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Martin v. Continental Investors

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
May 10, 1991
934 F.2d 1265 (11th Cir. 1991)

awarding costs for statute of limitations research and briefing and approving assessment of costs and expenses related to motion for voluntary dismissal if such motion were granted

Summary of this case from Brown v. Boeing Co.

stating that Alabama's law permitting rescission of an insurance policy for fraud in the insurance application is "plainly state law which regulates insurance" and thus are not preempted by ERISA

Summary of this case from Security Life Ins. Co. of America v. Meyling
Case details for

Martin v. Continental Investors

Case Details

Full title:Martin v. Continental Investors

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: May 10, 1991

Citations

934 F.2d 1265 (11th Cir. 1991)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. City of Montgomery, Ala.

Id. The defendants appealed and the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the court's decision. United States v. City of…

Morstein v. National Ins. Services, Inc.

I note that some district courts in our circuit have attempted to distinguish Farlow and provide a remedy for…