From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshwood Co. v. Jamie Mills, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jun 1, 1950
10 F.R.D. 590 (N.D. Ohio 1950)

Summary

granting motion to protect a trade secret

Summary of this case from Monroe v. Sisters of Saint Francis Health Services

Opinion

         Action by Marshwood Company against Jamie Mills, Inc., and others to enjoin defendants from disclosing a secret recipe, wherein a motion to take defendants' depositions was granted and subpoena duces tecum issued for the production of documents, including those which would show the recipe being used by defendants. On defendants' motion for an order for protection against unjustified and unwarranted annoyance and oppression, the District Court, Jones, Chief Judge, held that defendants would be afforded adequate protection by an order that examination be held with only the parties and their officers and counsel present and that depositions be sealed and opened only on order of court and that plaintiff file with clerk of court all documents relating to its secret process in a sealed envelope to be opened only as directed by court.

         Order in accordance with opinion.

          Albert J. Williams, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

          Vern L. Oldham, Cleveland, Ohio, Albert H. Oldham, Akron, Ohio, William L. Bantz, Barberton, Ohio, for defendants.


          JONES, Chief Judge.

         This is an action in which plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendants from disclosing a certain secret recipe. A motion for the taking of defendants' depositions has been granted and a subpoena duces tecum issued for the production of certain documents including those which will show the recipe now being used by defendants. Defendants have moved under Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 30(b), 28 U.S.C.A., for an order for protection against unjustified and unwarranted annoyance and oppression.

         The objections are based primarily on the desire of the defendants to keep certain business information from a competing business. However, the documents probably contain information which will aid the Court in determining issues to be presented to it by a motion for a preliminary injunction.

         It would seem, therefore, that adequate protection will be afforded by an order that the examination shall be held with no one present except the parties and their officers and counsel, and after the depositions have been taken that they be sealed and opened only on the order of this Court.

         Since this means that defendants' secret recipe will be disclosed to plaintiff, it will be ordered that before the depositions are taken, plaintiff must file with the Clerk of this court all documents relating to its secret process in a sealed envelope to be opened only as directed by this Court.


Summaries of

Marshwood Co. v. Jamie Mills, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jun 1, 1950
10 F.R.D. 590 (N.D. Ohio 1950)

granting motion to protect a trade secret

Summary of this case from Monroe v. Sisters of Saint Francis Health Services
Case details for

Marshwood Co. v. Jamie Mills, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARSHWOOD CO. v. JAMIE MILLS, Inc. et al.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jun 1, 1950

Citations

10 F.R.D. 590 (N.D. Ohio 1950)
10 F.R.D. 590
87 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 85

Citing Cases

Snyker v. Snyker

That this may be effectively done is illustrated by the analogous cases which have arisen under Rule 34, as…

Monroe v. Sisters of Saint Francis Health Services

Other instances of good cause have included separating witnesses to prevent the possibility of one witness…