From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION
Oct 26, 2012
CASE NO. 4:06-CR-26 (CDL) (M.D. Ga. Oct. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:06-CR-26 (CDL)

10-26-2012

RIVIERA MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After a de novo review of the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge on February 27, 2012 is hereby approved, adopted, and made the Order of the Court. The objection of the Petitioner has been considered and is found to be without merit. The Court does note that to the extent the Magistrate Judge's recommendation references the incorrect edition of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines regarding Petitioner's Ground 7, the Court has examined the correct edition and finds no difference between the applicable guideline in the correct edition and the edition referenced by the Magistrate Judge. Under the correct edition, Petitioner is not entitled to a sentence reduction. The Court also adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation that a Certificate of Appealability should be denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 25th day of October, 2012.

______________________

CLAY D. LAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Marshall v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION
Oct 26, 2012
CASE NO. 4:06-CR-26 (CDL) (M.D. Ga. Oct. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Marshall v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RIVIERA MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 26, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 4:06-CR-26 (CDL) (M.D. Ga. Oct. 26, 2012)

Citing Cases

Bonita v. United States

"Thus, where trial counsel determines that further investigation is unnecessary, he cannot be ineffective for…