From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jan 29, 1979
603 S.W.2d 393 (Ark. 1979)

Opinion

No. CR 78-199

Opinion delivered January 29, 1979

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION OF RECORD ON PRIOR APPEAL. — NO NECESSITY FOR MOTION. — Since Rule 9(d), Rules of the Supreme Court, provides that, on a second or subsequent appeal, the abstract shall include a condensation of all pertinent portions of the record on any prior appeal, a motion by an appellant for consideration of the record on a prior appeal of the case is unnecessary.

Order on Motion pertaining to record on prior appeal.


Appellant's motion for consideration of the record on a prior appeal in this case is granted even though it is a useless motion. Rule 9(d) of the rules of this court clearly provides: "On a second or subsequent appeal, the abstract shall include a condensation of all pertinent portions of the record filed on any prior appeal."

The purpose of the entry of this order is to call the attention of the bar to the fact that such motions are unnecessary.

Printer's Note: The opinion on consideration of this case appears in 265 Ark. 302, 578 S.W.2d 32.


Summaries of

Marshall v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jan 29, 1979
603 S.W.2d 393 (Ark. 1979)
Case details for

Marshall v. State

Case Details

Full title:Charles Edward MARSHALL v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 29, 1979

Citations

603 S.W.2d 393 (Ark. 1979)
264 Ark. 34

Citing Cases

Ward v. McCord

[1] Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rule 4-2(a)(5) expressly states in pertinent part: "On a…

Chickopee Mfg. v. 1st Nat'l Bank

The substance of the testimony of an expert for the appellees in the case before us was that the gas is…