From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Crane

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Dec 1, 1959
162 N.E.2d 669 (Mass. 1959)

Opinion

December 1, 1959.

Milton Schwartz, for the plaintiff.

Robert Fulton, for the defendant.


Exceptions overruled. This is an action of tort for personal injuries allegedly received in a motor accident. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The only exception is to the denial of the plaintiff's motion for a new trial. There was no abuse of discretion. Haines Corp. v. Winthrop Square Cafe, Inc. 335 Mass. 152, 154. Statkus v. Metropolitan Transit Authy. 335 Mass. 172, 174. The plaintiff's brief is in violation of Rule 15 of the Rules for the Regulation of Practice before the Full Court (1952), as amended, 337 Mass. 818-819, in that there is no reference by pages to the record in stating alleged facts and alleged previous proceedings. The plaintiff's brief is struck from the files of the court.


Summaries of

Marshall v. Crane

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Dec 1, 1959
162 N.E.2d 669 (Mass. 1959)
Case details for

Marshall v. Crane

Case Details

Full title:HENRY F. MARSHALL vs. WALTER F. CRANE

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Dec 1, 1959

Citations

162 N.E.2d 669 (Mass. 1959)
339 Mass. 780

Citing Cases

Courtney v. Charles Dowd Box Co.

Had appropriate motions been made, we might have struck the briefs from the files. See Marshall v. Crane, 339…

Commonwealth v. Wilson

There has been, with respect to this exception, almost complete failure to comply with S.J.C. Rule 1:15 (2),…