From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marsh v. Marsh

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Apr 6, 1962
114 N.W.2d 379 (Neb. 1962)

Opinion

No. 35058.

Filed April 6, 1962.

APPEAL from the district court for Cheyenne County: TED R. FEIDLER, JUDGE. On motion for rehearing. See ante p. 282, 113 N.W.2d 323, for original opinion. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled. Reversed and remanded.

Beatty, Clarke, Murphy, Morgan, Pedersen Piccolo, L. W. Balderson, and Lowell C. Davis, for appellants.

Clinton, McNish, for appellees.

Heard before CARTER, MESSMORE, YEAGER, SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, and BROWER, JJ.


SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION


In our opinion previously issued in this case we directed that the judgment or judgments of the district court be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the entire action without prejudice to a new action. Since the release of that opinion a supplemental transcript has been filed in this court showing that service of process was had on all parties having an interest in the litigation.

In a motion for rehearing appellee Dora Marsh asserts that the remand with directions to dismiss can only have the effect of delaying the proceedings, causing unnecessary expense in refiling the action and of obtaining new service of process upon the defendants. The point is well taken. We withdraw the last paragraph of our previous opinion in Marsh v. Marsh, ante p. 282, 113 N.W.2d 323, and substitute therefor the following: The judgment or judgments of the district court are reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

The motion for a rehearing is otherwise overruled.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Marsh v. Marsh

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Apr 6, 1962
114 N.W.2d 379 (Neb. 1962)
Case details for

Marsh v. Marsh

Case Details

Full title:HARVEY E. MARSH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ALFRED E…

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Apr 6, 1962

Citations

114 N.W.2d 379 (Neb. 1962)
114 N.W.2d 379