From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marsh v. London

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 13, 1966
181 So. 2d 186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

No. 65-340.

December 14, 1965. Rehearing Denied January 13, 1966.

Martin S. Saxon, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Herman T. Isis, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C.J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.


Affirmed upon authority of the law stated in Lopez v. Lopez, Fla. 1956, 90 So.2d 456, at page 458, where, in speaking of the purchase of property where title had been taken as an estate by the entirety, the Supreme Court said:

"We do not consider the purchase money mortgages and notes involved in this cause to be a common burden. We construe that the husband and wife were each obligated for the whole of the debt, since each is considered to have purchased and owned the whole estate. Their interests were not divisible. Ashwood v. Patterson, Fla. 1951, 49 So.2d 848."

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Marsh v. London

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 13, 1966
181 So. 2d 186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Marsh v. London

Case Details

Full title:GEORGIA FRANKLIN MARSH, ALSO KNOWN AS GEORGIA F. MARSH, ALSO KNOWN AS MRS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 13, 1966

Citations

181 So. 2d 186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Citing Cases

Taber v. Taber

See Clawson v. Clawson, 54 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1951). In such an estate, both parties are obligated for the whole…

Marsh v. London

Appeal dismissed without opinion. 181 So.2d 186.…