From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marquez v. Neven

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 24, 2021
Case No. 3:20-cv-00073-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Mar. 24, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 3:20-cv-00073-RCJ-WGC

03-24-2021

Johnny Marquez, Petitioner, v. Dwight Neven, et al., Respondents.

Rene L. Valladares Federal Public Defender Nevada State Bar No. 11479 Jeremy C. Baron Assistant Federal Public Defender District of Columbia Bar No. 1021801 411 E. Bonneville Ave. Suite 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6577 jeremy_baron@fd.org Attorney for Petitioner Johnny Marquez


Rene L. Valladares
Federal Public Defender
Nevada State Bar No. 11479
Jeremy C. Baron
Assistant Federal Public Defender
District of Columbia Bar No. 1021801
411 E. Bonneville Ave. Suite 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 388-6577
jeremy_baron@fd.org Attorney for Petitioner Johnny Marquez

Order Granting Unopposed motion for extension of time in which to file second amended petition

(Third request)

Johnny Marquez respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time of thirty-two (32) days, from March 11, 2021, to and including April 12, 2021, to file a second amended petition.

ARGUMENT

After the Court appointed counsel to represent Mr. Marquez in this federal habeas action, Mr. Marquez received leave to file an initial first amended protective petition, along with a second amended petition. The second amended petition is currently due March 11, 2021.

Counsel respectfully suggests additional time is necessary to properly prepare the second amended petition. As the previous extension motions explained, the first amended protective petition (which includes all the claims Mr. Marquez litigated in state court) is 76 pages and encompasses eight claims for relief (as well as subclaims). Since the previous extension motions, counsel has continued to review these claims, along with the state court record, with a view toward finalizing the second amended petition. However, additional time remains necessary to complete the process of reviewing the state court record and filing the second amended petition.

Counsel has had many professional obligations in the past two months, including, among others, a reply brief filed on January 11, 2021, in Bynoe v. Baca, Case No. 81083 (Nev. Sup. Ct.); a petition for a writ of certiorari filed on January 22, 2021, in Centofanti v. Neven, Case No. 20-6957 (U.S.); a second amended petition filed on January 27, 2021, in Crawford v. Howell, Case No. 2:19-cv-01574-RFB-BNW (D. Nev.); a reply in support of a petition due on February 18, 2021, in Burch v. Baker, Case No. 2:17-cv-00656-MMD-VCF (D. Nev.); an application for a certificate of appealability filed on March 3, 2021, in Richard v. Gentry, Case No. 21-15157 (9th Cir.); and a reply brief filed on March 5, 2021, in Cortinas v. Gentry, Case No. 20-16227 (9th Cir.). In addition, counsel spent substantial time preparing for an evidentiary hearing previously scheduled on February 8, 2021, in Bradford v. Gittere, Case No. 2:13-cv-01784-RFB-EJW (D. Nev.), although the Court postponed that hearing date due to the unanticipated unavailability of a witness for the State.

Counsel has many additional professional obligations in the next two months, including, among others, a reply brief due on March 16, 2021, in Patterson v. Hutchings, Case No. 20-15635 (9th Cir.); a reply in support of a petition due on March 18, 2021, in Esquivel v. Williams, Case No. 2:17-cv-02227-RFB-BNW (D. Nev.); an amended petition due on March 22, 2021, in Carley v. Gentry, Case No. 2:14-cv-02097-JCM-BNW (D. Nev.); a second amended petition due on April 13, 2021, in Thomas v. Williams, Case No. 2:18-cv-00020-GMN-PAL (D. Nev.); and an amended petition due on April 20, 2021, in Carroll v. Dzurenda, Case No. 2:20-cv-01691-GMN-NJK (D. Nev.).

On March 11, 2021, counsel contacted Deputy Attorney General Adam Solinger and informed him of this request for an extension of time. As a matter of professional courtesy, Mr. Solinger had no objection. His lack of objection shouldn't be considered a waiver of any procedural defenses or statute of limitations challenges, or construed as agreeing with the accuracy of the representations in this motion.

In sum, counsel requests an additional thirty-two (32) days, up to and including April 12, 2021, in which to file the second amended petition. This is counsel's third request for an extension of time to file the second amended petition. This motion isn't filed for the purposes of delay, but in the interests of justice, as well as in Mr. Marquez's interest. Counsel respectfully asks the Court to grant the requested extension.

Dated March 11, 2021.

Respectfully submitted,

Rene L. Valladares

Federal Public Defender

/s/Jeremy C . Baron

Jeremy C. Baron

Assistant Federal Public Defender

IT IS SO ORDERED:

/s/_________

United States District Judge

Dated: March 24, 2021.


Summaries of

Marquez v. Neven

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 24, 2021
Case No. 3:20-cv-00073-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Mar. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Marquez v. Neven

Case Details

Full title:Johnny Marquez, Petitioner, v. Dwight Neven, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 24, 2021

Citations

Case No. 3:20-cv-00073-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Mar. 24, 2021)