From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marmolejo v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 14, 2008
519 F.3d 907 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 04-76644.

March 14, 2008.

Christopher J. Stender, Stender Pope, PC, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.

Surell Brady, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, District Counsel, Office of the District Chief Counsel, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Marmolejo v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 14, 2008
519 F.3d 907 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Marmolejo v. Mukasey

Case Details

Full title:Armando MARMOLEJO-CAMPOS, aka Campos Ramos Armando, Petitioner, v. Michael…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 14, 2008

Citations

519 F.3d 907 (9th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Marmolejo-Campos v. Holder

A divided panel of our court denied the petition, upholding the Board's determination that a violation of…