From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marks v. Macchiarola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1995
221 A.D.2d 217 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 16, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (William J. Davis, J.).


In this action, two partners of a would be accounting partnership that never came into being seek to recover the pro rata share of the rent due for an approximate four-year period from the third intended partner under a lease signed by all three parties, based, apparently, on an October 20, 1987 oral agreement. Defendant never interposed the affirmative defense of statute of frauds as to the oral agreement, a fact which we noted in the context of its having been waived as a result thereof when this matter was before us on an earlier appeal ( 204 A.D.2d 221). When we spoke of waiver we meant under the particular answer at issue and did not imply, as the IAS Court believed, that defendant was forever foreclosed from amending his answer. Leave to amend "shall be freely given" "at any time" (CPLR 3025 [b]), even as to defenses deemed "waived" pursuant to CPLR 3211 (e) when not raised "'either by * * * motion or in the responsive pleading.'" ( Pegno Constr. Corp. v City of New York, 95 A.D.2d 655, 656.)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Marks v. Macchiarola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1995
221 A.D.2d 217 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Marks v. Macchiarola

Case Details

Full title:MORTON MARKS et al., Respondents, v. ROY MACCHIAROLA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 217 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
634 N.Y.S.2d 56

Citing Cases

Zuckerman v. City of New York

Although objections pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) are waived if not invoked in the movant's answer (CPLR 3211…

Specialists in Urology v. Costello

Considering the absence of any prejudice or surprise to defendant and in view of the short three-month delay…