From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marks v. Esperdy

U.S.
May 18, 1964
377 U.S. 214 (1964)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

No. 253.

Argued April 2, 1964. Decided May 18, 1964.

315 F.2d 673, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Murray A. Gordon argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Charles Gordon argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and L. Paul Winings.


The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the decision of this case.


Summaries of

Marks v. Esperdy

U.S.
May 18, 1964
377 U.S. 214 (1964)
Case details for

Marks v. Esperdy

Case Details

Full title:MARKS v . ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION…

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 18, 1964

Citations

377 U.S. 214 (1964)
84 S. Ct. 1224

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Yakou

There is yet another reason for adopting Yakou's position that LPR status can change without formal…

Rocha v. Immigration Naturalization Service

In Mackenzie v. Hare, 1915, 239 U.S. 299, 36 S.Ct. 106, 60 L.Ed. 297, a unanimous court upheld its…