From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Markman v. Carrion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Sep 26, 2014
120 A.D.3d 1580 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

931 TP 14-00070

09-26-2014

In the Matter of Kevin MARKMAN, Petitioner, v. Gladys CARRION, Commissioner, New York State Office of Children and Family Services and Kelly A. Reed, Commissioner, Monroe County Department of Human Services, Respondents.

The Abbatoy Law Firm, PLLC, Rochester (David M. Abbatoy, Jr., of Counsel), for Petitioner. Merideth H. Smith, County Attorney, Rochester (Peter A. Essley of Counsel), for Respondent Kelly A. Reed, Commissioner, Monroe County Department of Human Services. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Julie M. Sheridan of Counsel), for Respondent Gladys Carrion, Commissioner, New York State Office of Children and Family Services.


The Abbatoy Law Firm, PLLC, Rochester (David M. Abbatoy, Jr., of Counsel), for Petitioner.

Merideth H. Smith, County Attorney, Rochester (Peter A. Essley of Counsel), for Respondent Kelly A. Reed, Commissioner, Monroe County Department of Human Services.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Julie M. Sheridan of Counsel), for Respondent Gladys Carrion, Commissioner, New York State Office of Children and Family Services.

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, and WHALEN, JJ.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM: Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul the determination, made after a fair hearing, denying in part his request to amend an indicated report of maltreatment with respect to two of his children to an unfounded report, and to seal it (see Social Services Law § 422[8][a][v] ; [c][ii] ). We conclude that the determination is supported by substantial evidence and therefore decline to disturb it (see Matter of Arbogast v. New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., Special Hearing Bur., 119 A.D.3d 1454, 1454–1455, 990 N.Y.S.2d 399 ; Matter of Parker v. Carrion, 90 A.D.3d 512, 512, 935 N.Y.S.2d 14 ). Where, as here, hearsay evidence is “sufficiently relevant and probative,” it may constitute substantial evidence (People ex rel. Vega v. Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130, 139, 495 N.Y.S.2d 332, 485 N.E.2d 997 ; see Matter of Bullock v. State of N.Y. Dept. of Social Servs., 248 A.D.2d 380, 382, 669 N.Y.S.2d 618 ). The Administrative Law Judge credited the children's accounts of the incidents over petitioner's denials thereof, and we perceive no basis to disturb those credibility determinations (see generally Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193 ; Matter of Scaccia v. Martinez, 9 A.D.3d 882, 883, 779 N.Y.S.2d 680 ).

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.


Summaries of

Markman v. Carrion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Sep 26, 2014
120 A.D.3d 1580 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Markman v. Carrion

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF KEVIN MARKMAN, PETITIONER, v. GLADYS CARRION…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Sep 26, 2014

Citations

120 A.D.3d 1580 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
993 N.Y.S.2d 593
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 6435

Citing Cases

Theresa WW. v. New York State Office of Children & Family Services

The remaining foster child was three years old at the time of the investigation and did not respond to the…

Pitts v. N.Y. State Office of Children & Family Servs.

“At an administrative expungement hearing, a report of child ... maltreatment must be established by a fair…