From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Markley v. Sheffield Lake

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 18, 1952
107 N.E.2d 114 (Ohio 1952)

Opinion

No. 33097

Decided June 18, 1952.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Municipal corporations — Ballot recited bond issue for constructing main sewer in named street — General plan of sewerage system approved and contracts awarded — Revised plan filed several months later — Showing main sewer line in another street — Injunction action — Judgment for plaintiffs reversed by Court of Appeals — Cessation of work under contract — New administration elected — Second revised plan approved by council and filed with clerk — Village sewerage system to connect with that of adjoining city — Village to pay city — Portion of cost of connecting sewer — Yearly fee based on gallonage of sewage disposed of — Authority of village council — To change preliminary plans — To proceed with other plans as approved — To discontinue work under revised plans — To adopt second revised plans deemed more efficient — To contract with contiguous city for disposal of village sewage — Levying and application of taxes — Section 5, Article XII, Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lorain county.

Mr. Henry P. Webber and Mr. Virgil C. Burgett, for appellant.

Mr. William G. Wickens and Mr. Lon B. Adams, for appellee village of Sheffield Lake.

Mr. Edward J. Conley, for appellee city of Lorain.


It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Markley v. Sheffield Lake

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 18, 1952
107 N.E.2d 114 (Ohio 1952)
Case details for

Markley v. Sheffield Lake

Case Details

Full title:MARKLEY, APPELLANT v. VILLAGE OF SHEFFIELD LAKE ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 18, 1952

Citations

107 N.E.2d 114 (Ohio 1952)
107 N.E.2d 114

Citing Cases

Harriman v. Northern Securities Co.

The indisposition of the court to grant relief is not limited to the cases in which the plaintiff is…