From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marion v. Bryn Mawr Tr. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 5, 2021
264 A.3d 336 (Pa. 2021)

Opinion

No. 311 MAL 2021

10-05-2021

David H. MARION, Receiver for Bentley Financial Services, Inc. and Entrust Group, Respondent v. BRYN MAWR TRUST COMPANY, Petitioner



ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of October 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allowance of appeal is denied as to the remaining issue. The issue to be considered on appeal, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred when it: (a) recognized a novel cause of action for aiding and abetting fraud; (b) held that actual knowledge is not required to satisfy the elements of the tort; and (c) failed to recognize that the jury's no-liability finding necessarily barred relief[?]


Summaries of

Marion v. Bryn Mawr Tr. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 5, 2021
264 A.3d 336 (Pa. 2021)
Case details for

Marion v. Bryn Mawr Tr. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID H. MARION, RECEIVER FOR BENTLEY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND ENTRUST…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 5, 2021

Citations

264 A.3d 336 (Pa. 2021)

Citing Cases

Marion v. Bryn Mawr Tr. Co.

II. BMT sought allowance of appeal, which this Court granted, limited to the following issue as stated by…