From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marchand v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 3, 1989
546 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-1911.

August 3, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County; Robert R. Perry, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dee R. Ball, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


In this case the trial court's written order placing the appellant on fifteen years' probation for lewd and lascivious assault does not comport with its oral pronouncement of five years on probation. The state concedes that this cause must be remanded to the trial court for clarification.

This cause is remanded to the trial court for either correction or reaffirmation of the sentence. See Wilkins v. State, 543 So.2d 800 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); cf. Venuti v. State, 437 So.2d 238 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (state conceded clerical error).

DAUKSCH, COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marchand v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 3, 1989
546 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Marchand v. State

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD MARCHAND, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 3, 1989

Citations

546 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

T.A.R. v. State

These discrepancies between the oral and written dispositions require that the disposition order be vacated…

Lester v. State

Generally, an oral sentencing pronouncement prevails over a subsequent written sentence where the state…