Summary
finding a possible liberty interest in attending a county fair
Summary of this case from B.K. v. NielsenOpinion
NO. CV-07-182-RHW.
September 29, 2009
ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Before the Court is the parties' Joint Stipulated Motion Re: Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (Ct. Rec. 74). The motion was heard without oral argument.
The parties stipulate to the following:
1. Defendant withdraws its Motion for Reconsideration.
2. Plaintiff dismisses with prejudice her independent "freedom of association" claim.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The parties' Joint Stipulated Motion Re: Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (Ct. Rec. 74) is GRANTED.
2. Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (Ct. Rec. 61) is withdrawn.
3. Plaintiff's independent "freedom of association" claim is dismissed with prejudice.
4. Defendant's Motion to Expedite (Ct. Rec. 59) is GRANTED.
5. Defendant's Motion to Expedite Rule on Objections (Ct. Rec. 64) is GRANTED.
6. Defendant's Motion for Ruling on Objections Made in the Perpetuation Testimony of Judy Warnick (Ct. Rec. 66) is DENIED, for the reasons stated at the September 18, 2009 hearing.
7. Joint Motion to Shorten Time (Ct. Rec. 72) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby directed to enter this Order and to furnish copies to counsel.