Opinion
November, 1912.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Smith, P.J., and Houghton, J., who dissented on the ground that the court erred in applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Marceau v. Rutland Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1912
153 App. Div. 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)
Summaries of
Marceau v. Rutland Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1912
153 App. Div. 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)
Case details for
Marceau v. Rutland Railroad Company
Case Details
Full title:Arthur G. Marceau, Respondent, v. The Rutland Railroad Company, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1912
Citations
153 App. Div. 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)
Citing Cases
Francey v. Rutland R.R. Co.
This action was subsequently brought, as was one by the fireman, to recover damages for the injuries…