From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marathon Oil Co. v. Malcolm

U.S.
Dec 14, 1981
454 U.S. 1125 (1981)

Summary

holding that where the appellant specifies a judgment or a part thereof, appellate court "has no jurisdiction to review other judgments or issues which are not expressly referred to and which are not impliedly intended for appeal."

Summary of this case from Swisher International, Inc. v. U.S.

Opinion

No. 81-874.

December 14, 1981.


C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 642 F. 2d 845 and 651 F. 2d 1016.


Summaries of

Marathon Oil Co. v. Malcolm

U.S.
Dec 14, 1981
454 U.S. 1125 (1981)

holding that where the appellant specifies a judgment or a part thereof, appellate court "has no jurisdiction to review other judgments or issues which are not expressly referred to and which are not impliedly intended for appeal."

Summary of this case from Swisher International, Inc. v. U.S.

reviewing district court's ruling to substitute a juror with an alternate for abuse of discretion

Summary of this case from State v. Davis
Case details for

Marathon Oil Co. v. Malcolm

Case Details

Full title:MARATHON OIL CO. ET AL. v. MALCOLM, FORMERLY DBA SPAR OIL CO. ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 14, 1981

Citations

454 U.S. 1125 (1981)

Citing Cases

Wagschal v. Bd. of Examiners

Such a substitution would be based on the theory that the petitioner's job at Danville gave her the identical…

U.S. Philips Corp. v. Windmere Corp.

In the Eleventh Circuit, "[t]o avoid a directed verdict, [Windmere] must have presented sufficient evidence…