Summary
dismissing aiding and abetting fiduciary duty claim when underlying fiduciary duty claim was dismissed under Rule 23.1
Summary of this case from GATZ v. PONSOLDTOpinion
No. 23, 2003.
Submitted: May 28, 2003.
Decided: May 29, 2003.
Court Below: Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County C. A. No. 18451
Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, BERGER and STEELE, Justices.
Appeal dismissed.
Unpublished opinion is below.
STACY FEINGLASS MANZO on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, MARTIN L. GRASS, TIMOTHY J. NOONAN, FRANKLIN C. BROWN, NANCY A. LIEBERMAN, LEONARD STERN, PRESTON R. TISCH, WILLIAM J. BRATTON, and KPMG LLP, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 23, 2003. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: May 28, 2003. Decided: May 29, 2003.
ORDER
This 29th day of May 2003, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, and their contentions in oral argument, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons set forth in its decision dated December 19, 2002.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED.