affirming the trial court's decision that "the breach of the [agreement] was material as a matter of law" because the "essential purpose of the [agreement] was . . . effectively rendered . . . a nullity."
Summary of this case from Paramount Fin. Commc'ns, Inc. v. Broadridge Inv'r Commc'n Sols., Inc.NO. 2040 WDA 2014
12-23-2015
R. Manning v. W. Kelly
Disposition: Affirmed.
affirming the trial court's decision that "the breach of the [agreement] was material as a matter of law" because the "essential purpose of the [agreement] was . . . effectively rendered . . . a nullity."
Summary of this case from Paramount Fin. Commc'ns, Inc. v. Broadridge Inv'r Commc'n Sols., Inc.affirming the trial court's decision that “the breach of the [agreement] was material as a matter of law” because the “essential purpose of the [agreement] was … effectively rendered … a ity.”
Summary of this case from American Diabetes Ass'n v. Friskney Family Trust, LLCFull title:R. Manning v. W. Kelly
Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Date published: Dec 23, 2015
Nevertheless, Pennsylvania appellate courts have affirmed lower courts' findings of materiality as a matter…
American Diabetes Ass'n v. Friskney Family Trust, LLCNevertheless, Pennsylvania appellate courts have affirmed lower courts' findings of materiality as a matter…