From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manning v. Sikorskyj

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1994
204 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 27, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Balio, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The record reflects that the attorney conducted the interview in question while acting as attorney for the estate of Lisa M. Manning, and we conclude that the tape recording of the interview was protected from discovery as attorney work product (see, CPLR 3101 [c]). It is not necessary for us to decide whether the tape is also protected by the attorney-client privilege on the ground that, at the time, the attorney was also representing Mary Beth Manning.


Summaries of

Manning v. Sikorskyj

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1994
204 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Manning v. Sikorskyj

Case Details

Full title:JAMES J. MANNING, JR., as Administrator of the Estate of LISA M. MANNING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 27, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 949

Citing Cases

Arons v. Jutkowitz

( Zimmerman v Jamaica Hosp., 143 AD2d 86; Fraylich v Maimonides Hosp., 251 AD2d 251; Tiborsky v Martorella,…

Geffner v. Mercy Med. Ctr.

ty Asbestos Litig., 109 A.D.3d 7, 12, 966 N.Y.S.2d 420 ; Salzer v. Farm Family Life Ins. Co., 280 A.D.2d 844,…