Summary
finding the State's examination of the blood spatter expert merely pointed out that defendant had access to the physical evidence if he wanted to challenge the State's findings and did not suggest he possessed the burden of proving his innocence; further, the State's comments concerning defendant's failure to cross-examine its expert blood spatter witness appears proper rebuttal to the defense argument which questioned the validity of the witness's testimony
Summary of this case from State v. JonesOpinion
No. 04-8851.
April 4, 2005.
Certiorari Denied.
Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 885 So. 2d 1044.