From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manning v. Dunn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 14, 1985
107 A.D.2d 674 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

January 14, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Vitale, J.).


Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted on condition that plaintiff's attorneys pay the sum of $250 to each of the respondents appearing on this appeal, for a total of $1,250, within 30 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry; in the event such condition is not complied with, order affirmed, with one bill of costs.

In these actions to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff Peter Manning in a skiing accident, the cases were marked off the Trial Calendar in July, 1981, apparently on the ground that the parties were not ready to proceed. About a year later, plaintiffs moved to restore the cases to the Trial Calendar, contending that the delay was due to Peter Manning's law studies and his inability to attend a protracted trial. Special Term denied the motion without prejudice to an application to vacate the automatic dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3404. Plaintiffs' subsequent motion to vacate the dismissal was denied.

We reverse and exercise our discretion to excuse the default. The merits of plaintiffs' actions were demonstrated by a physician's affidavit and portions of plaintiff Peter Manning's deposition. While the excuse for the delay was not wholly satisfactory, it is sufficient under the circumstances to warrant vacating the dismissal (see National States Elec. Corp. v Insurance Co., 103 A.D.2d 824; Wilenski v. Auricchio Monuments, 102 A.D.2d 824). It is also significant that the actions were originally stricken on consent of the parties with leave to restore (see Pirnak v. Savino, 96 A.D.2d 857) and that there is no indication of prejudice to the defendants and the third-party defendants. In view of the nature of plaintiffs' excuse, we have fixed an appropriate sanction as a condition of the relief granted (see Stolpiec v. Wiener, 100 A.D.2d 931). Mollen, P.J., Lazer, O'Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Manning v. Dunn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 14, 1985
107 A.D.2d 674 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Manning v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:PETER MANNING, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, JOHN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 14, 1985

Citations

107 A.D.2d 674 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Hillegass v. Duffy, Howard Express

The plaintiff's motion to restore her action to the calendar must be treated as a motion to vacate that…