From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manning v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 11, 1990
553 N.E.2d 264 (Ohio 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-1774

Submitted February 6, 1990 —

Decided April 11, 1990.

Habeas corpus — Relief denied when adequate remedy at law exists.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Madison County, No. CA89-05-006.

Paul R. Manning, pro se.


The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed based on our decision in In re Petition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 222, 551 N.E.2d 954, in which we held that appeal to this court pursuant to Section 2(B)( 2)(a)(iii) of Article IV of the Ohio Constitution is an adequate remedy at law to pursue a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel and that such actions may not be maintained in habeas corpus.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Manning v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 11, 1990
553 N.E.2d 264 (Ohio 1990)
Case details for

Manning v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:MANNING, APPELLANT, v. ALEXANDER, SUPT., APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 11, 1990

Citations

553 N.E.2d 264 (Ohio 1990)
50 Ohio St. 3d 127

Citing Cases

Manning v. Alexander

While Manning raised his claim in the state court, the district court found that he did not do so properly…

White v. Schotten

However, as this court's decision in Manning v. Alexander, 912 F.2d 878, 882 (6th Cir. 1990), made clear,…