From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manning v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Jun 14, 2012
No. 5:12-cv-75-DPM-BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 14, 2012)

Opinion

No. 5:12-cv-75-DPM-BD

06-14-2012

RECO MANNING PLAINTIFF v. ED ADAMS, Captain, W.C. Dub Brassell Detention Facility DEFENDANT


ORDER

Reco Manning is no longer detained at the W.C. Dub Brassell Detention Center. Document No. 18. Because Manning has not provided the Court with his current mailing address, the Court has been unable to contact Manning for almost two months. Document Nos. 16 &20. Manning's complaint is therefore dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).

So Ordered.

__________________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Manning v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Jun 14, 2012
No. 5:12-cv-75-DPM-BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Manning v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:RECO MANNING PLAINTIFF v. ED ADAMS, Captain, W.C. Dub Brassell Detention…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Jun 14, 2012

Citations

No. 5:12-cv-75-DPM-BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 14, 2012)

Citing Cases

Labbadia v. Bailey

Labbadia v. Bailey, supra, 89; Gager v. Carlson, 146 Conn. 288, 292, 150 A.2d 302; Taft v. Bridgeton Worsted…

IN RE MADSEN'S EST

Utah Mercur Gold Mining Company v. Herschel Gold Mining Company, 103 Utah 249, 134 P.2d 1094.Adams v.…