From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manhattan Industries v. Goldstein

U.S.
Dec 2, 1985
474 U.S. 1005 (1985)

Summary

finding evidence of prior bid rigging relevant to intent and knowledge charged in Sherman Act

Summary of this case from Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Degussa-Huls Corp.

Opinion

No. 85-260.

December 2, 1985.


ORDER

C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 758 F. 2d 1435.


Summaries of

Manhattan Industries v. Goldstein

U.S.
Dec 2, 1985
474 U.S. 1005 (1985)

finding evidence of prior bid rigging relevant to intent and knowledge charged in Sherman Act

Summary of this case from Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Degussa-Huls Corp.

reviewing trial court decision as to whether jury compensatory damages award was excessive for "clear abuse of discretion"

Summary of this case from Griffin v. City of Opa-Locka

stating that front pay "may be particularly appropriate [in private employer ADEA cases] in lieu of reinstatement where discord and antagonism between the parties would render reinstatement ineffective as a make-whole remedy"

Summary of this case from Lewis v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc.

reviewing trial court decision as to whether jury compensatory damages award was excessive for "clear abuse of discretion"

Summary of this case from Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Nall's Newton Tire
Case details for

Manhattan Industries v. Goldstein

Case Details

Full title:MANHATTAN INDUSTRIES, INC. v. GOLDSTEIN

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 2, 1985

Citations

474 U.S. 1005 (1985)
106 S. Ct. 525

Citing Cases

State of Hawaii v. U.S.

The QTA's statute of limitations on the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity is strictly construed.…

Chastain v. Sundquist

As to constitutional and statutory torts, however, this circuit has concluded that members of Congress are…