From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manhattan Guide Co. v. Gluck

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Dec 1, 1906
52 Misc. 652 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)

Opinion

December, 1906.

Perry Allen, for appellants.

F. Wakefield Koch, for respondent.


Oral evidence, tending to establish an independent collateral agreement as a condition precedent to a contract becoming operative, is not evidence tending to vary or impeach a written instrument; and its exclusion constitutes reversible error. Benton v. Martin, 52 N.Y. 575; Burke v. Delaney, 153 U.S. 228.

Present: GILDERSLEEVE, FITZGERALD and DAVIS, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.


Summaries of

Manhattan Guide Co. v. Gluck

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Dec 1, 1906
52 Misc. 652 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)
Case details for

Manhattan Guide Co. v. Gluck

Case Details

Full title:THE MANHATTAN GUIDE COMPANY, Respondent, v . JOHN D. GLUCK et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Dec 1, 1906

Citations

52 Misc. 652 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)
101 N.Y.S. 528

Citing Cases

Continental Jewelry Co. v. Ingelstrom

The allegations and evidence raising such defense did not vary or change the terms of the written contract…