From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manhattan Apartments, Inc. v. Simeon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 28, 2004
11 A.D.3d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4454

October 28, 2004.

Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered July 23, 2002, which affirmed a judgment of Civil Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered February 13, 2001, awarding damages to plaintiff in the amount of $25,000 plus interest for a real estate broker's commission, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.


Plaintiff entered into an oral brokerage agreement for the sale of defendant Simeon's apartment. The broker indisputably introduced defendant Roy Alvis to the property, arranged for two on-site inspections, and was involved in sale negotiations. The apartment was eventually sold to defendant Marion Alvis (Roy's mother) at the same price that had been finally offered to the broker on Roy's behalf. The record showed that Marion was Roy's alter ego for the purpose of the sale, and that the sale itself was consummated mere weeks after the broker's last conversation with Roy. The trial court's determination that plaintiff had procured a ready, willing and able buyer, and was thus entitled to its commission, was based largely on credibility findings that are consistent with a fair interpretation of the evidence in the record, and should not be disturbed ( see Geraci v. Creative Leasing Concepts, 248 AD2d 214, lv denied sub nom. Geraci v. Rothenberg, 92 NY2d 806). [ See 2002 NY Slip Op 50308(U).]


Summaries of

Manhattan Apartments, Inc. v. Simeon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 28, 2004
11 A.D.3d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Manhattan Apartments, Inc. v. Simeon

Case Details

Full title:MANHATTAN APARTMENTS, INC., Respondent, v. FLORENCE SIMEON, Appellant, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 28, 2004

Citations

11 A.D.3d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
783 N.Y.S.2d 561

Citing Cases

Zohlman v. Zoldan

Pa., v Bodek, 270 AD2d 139 (1st Dept), lv app dism 95 NY2d 881, rearg den 95 NY2d 959 (2000) (court found…

Rivkin v. Century 21 Teran

III. The amicus' reliance on Sonnenschein v Douglas Elliman-Gibbons Ives ( 96 NY2d 369) is misplaced. Hiscock…