From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mancuso v. Russo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1987
132 A.D.2d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

July 6, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sacks, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by adding a provision to the third decretal paragraph thereof that the transfer of the deed shall be conditioned upon the defendant's discharge and release from all liability under the bond and mortgage; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff contributed virtually all of the funds toward the purchase of the real property in question, and the record supports the trial court's conclusion that the property was given to the defendant as a gift conditioned upon the marriage of the parties (see, Civil Rights Law § 80-b). Since the marriage never took place, the conveyance of the property to the plaintiff would satisfy the "clear purpose of section 80-b [and] * * * return the parties to the position they were in prior to their becoming engaged, without rewarding or punishing either party for the fact that the marriage failed to materialize" (Gaden v Gaden, 29 N.Y.2d 80, 88).

As the plaintiff concedes, the trial court should have conditioned the conveyance of the property upon the release and discharge of the defendant from liability under the bond and mortgage. The judgment appealed from has been modified accordingly. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mancuso v. Russo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1987
132 A.D.2d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Mancuso v. Russo

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD MANCUSO, Respondent, v. CHRISTINA RUSSO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1987

Citations

132 A.D.2d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Schwartz v. Miltz

The plaintiff testified that he and the defendant were engaged in 2000 and married in 2003, and the Supreme…

Clapper v. Kohls

Because the sole consideration for the transfer of the title to the real property was a contemplated marriage…