From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manbeck v. Town of Lewisboro

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 4, 2008
05 CIV. 4576 (CLB)(GAY) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2008)

Opinion

05 CIV. 4576 (CLB)(GAY).

March 4, 2008


ORDER


Before this Court are various motions dealing with discovery and other pre-trial procedural disputes. The Court has reviewed the extensive submissions from both sides and makes the following determinations.

I. Plaintiffs Motion to Strike, Dkt # 203

Plaintiffs' motion is denied. It is obvious to the Court that defense counsels omission of several pages from its motion for summary judgment was both unintentional and without prejudice to the plaintiffs. Indeed, defendants sent the missing pages to both the Court and plaintiffs as soon as the problem was identified.

II. Defendant Town's Motion to Strike, Dkt # 209

III. Defendant Fain's Cross Motion to Strike, Dkt # 214

IV. Plaintiffs' Request for Judicial Notice, Dkt # 226

The Court will review the submitted documents and take them into consideration.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Manbeck v. Town of Lewisboro

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 4, 2008
05 CIV. 4576 (CLB)(GAY) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2008)
Case details for

Manbeck v. Town of Lewisboro

Case Details

Full title:PETER MANBECK, et al Plaintiffs, v. TOWN OF LEWISBORO, et al Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 4, 2008

Citations

05 CIV. 4576 (CLB)(GAY) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2008)

Citing Cases

Copp v. Shane

Other courts have followed suit. See Lawson v. Tehama Cty., 2:17-cv-01276-TLN-GGH, 2017 WL 5177835, at * 12,…