From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malin v. Jaggers

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 13, 1975
216 S.E.2d 666 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

50319.

ARGUED MARCH 10, 1975.

DECIDED MAY 13, 1975.

Action for damages. Clayton Superior Court. Before Judge Banke.

Phillips Slotin, for appellant.

Daniel C. B. Levy, for appellee.


"Issues of negligence, including the related issues of assumption of risk, lack of ordinary care for one's own safety, lack of ordinary care in avoiding the consequences of another's negligence and comparative negligence, are ordinarily not susceptible of summary adjudication whether for or against the plaintiff or the defendant, but must be resolved by a trial in the ordinary manner." Wakefield v. A. R. Winter Co., 121 Ga. App. 259 ( 174 S.E.2d 178).

Furthermore, "While opinion evidence adduced by the respondent is sufficient to preclude the grant of a summary judgment ... it does not follow that the introduction of opinion evidence by the movant will authorize the grant of a summary judgment." Harrison v. Tuggle, 225 Ga. 211, 213 ( 167 S.E.2d 395).

A thorough review of the proof offered on defendant's motion for summary judgment reveals that the trial judge did not err in overruling such motion.

Judgment affirmed. Pannell, P. J., and Clark, J., concur.

ARGUED MARCH 10, 1975 — DECIDED MAY 13, 1975.


Summaries of

Malin v. Jaggers

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 13, 1975
216 S.E.2d 666 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Malin v. Jaggers

Case Details

Full title:MALIN v. JAGGERS

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 13, 1975

Citations

216 S.E.2d 666 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
216 S.E.2d 666

Citing Cases

Wright v. Shoney's of Savannah

On motion for summary judgment, ordinarily issues of negligence, including reasonable foreseeability,…

Morris v. Pulliam

As the evidence here must be based upon opinion testimony as well as conflicting testimony, including that of…