Summary
finding good cause when facts were discovered after the amendment deadline
Summary of this case from Lyles v. BroachOpinion
Docket No. 93-1381.
March 21, 1994
Appeal from and Citation (if reported) S.D.W.Va.
AFFIRMED.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Malagrida v. Holland
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 21, 1994
19 F.3d 1429 (4th Cir. 1994)
Summaries of
Malagrida v. Holland
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 21, 1994
19 F.3d 1429 (4th Cir. 1994)
finding good cause when facts were discovered after the amendment deadline
Summary of this case from Lyles v. Broachfinding abuse of discretion in the district court's refusal to allow amendment to add a new claim after scheduling order deadline
Summary of this case from Aloi v. Moroso Inv. Partners, LLCfinding abuse of discretion in the district court's refusal to allow amendment to add a new claim after scheduling order deadline
Summary of this case from Tawwaab v. Virginia Linen Service, Inc.concluding that district court abused its discretion when it denied motion to amend to add a new claim after deadline set in scheduling order had passed
Summary of this case from Battle v. Burwellconcluding that district court abused its discretion when it denied motion to amend to add a new claim after deadline set in scheduling order had passed
Summary of this case from Kolb v. ACRA Control, Ltd.concluding that district court abused its discretion when it denied motion to amend to add a new claim after deadline set in scheduling order had passed
Summary of this case from Wonasue v. Univ. of Md. Alumni Ass'nupholding the district court's grant of summary judgment where a plan administrator resolved a disputed factual issue
Summary of this case from Tobey v. Keiter, Stephens, Hurst, Gary & Shreavesnoting that when even "some" of the evidence supporting an amendment does not surface until after the amendment deadline, that "alone justifies a finding of good cause under Rule 16(b)"
Summary of this case from Waters at Magnolia Bay, LP v. Vaughn & Melton Consulting Eng'rs, Inc.applying the provision to a foreclosure on a note secured by real estate and personal property
Summary of this case from Davis v. CitiMortgage, Inc.In Lone Star, the court found a proposed amendment appropriate under both Rule 15(a) and 16(b) but did not resolve definitively whether a two-step analysis was required.
Summary of this case from Black v. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.Case details for
Malagrida v. Holland
Case Details
Full title:Malagrida v. Holland
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: Mar 21, 1994
Citations
19 F.3d 1429 (4th Cir. 1994)
Citing Cases
Waters at Magnolia Bay, LP v. Vaughn & Melton Consulting Eng'rs, Inc.
"The Fourth Circuit has noted that a finding of 'good cause' was justified under Rule 16(b) where some of the…
United States Home Corp. v. Settlers Crossing, LLCFurthermore, U.S. Home's cited cases in support of its argument that this claim should nevertheless be added…