From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malady v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jan 16, 2001
41 S.W.3d 543 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED77715.

Filed: January 16, 2001. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 12, 2001.

Application to Transfer Denied April 24, 2001.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, HONORABLE STAN J. MURPHY.

Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Stacy L. Anderson Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before: ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.



ORDER


Movant David Malady appeals from the denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Rule 29.15. Movant was convicted of second-degree felony murder, Section 565.021.1, RSMo 1994, first-degree robbery, Section 569.020, RSMo 1994, and first-degree burglary, Section 569.160, RSMo 1994. The judgment was affirmed by this Court on direct appeal in State v. Malady, 982 S.W.2d 775 (Mo.App.E.D. 1998).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's Rule 29.15 motion. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion for their exclusive use detailing the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Malady v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jan 16, 2001
41 S.W.3d 543 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Malady v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MALADY, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jan 16, 2001

Citations

41 S.W.3d 543 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Malady v. Dormire

(Resp. Exh. F.) The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of petitioner's motion for post-conviction…