From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Majors v. White

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 4, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 69537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. CAF 16-00404 DOCKET NO. U-00449-14

04-04-2016

MATTER OF COLLEEN R. MAJORS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. RANDY F. WHITE, JR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.


PRESENT:

Respondent-appellant having moved for permission to proceed as a poor person and for assignment of counsel on the appeal taken herein from an order of the Family Court, Genesee County, entered in the Office of the Clerk of said Court on March 4, 2016,

Now, upon reading and filing the affidavit of Randy F. White, Jr., sworn to March 9, 2016, and the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks the assignment of counsel is denied on the ground that such relief is not authorized (see Family Court Act §§ 262, 1120 [a]), and

It is further ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks permission to proceed as a poor person is denied with leave to renew upon the submission of a new motion that includes, among other things, an affidavit setting forth sufficient facts so that the merit of the contentions can be ascertained (see CPLR § 1101 [a]).

Entered: April 4, 2016

FRANCES E. CAFARELL, Clerk


Summaries of

Majors v. White

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 4, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 69537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Majors v. White

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF COLLEEN R. MAJORS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. RANDY F. WHITE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 4, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 69537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Citing Cases

Hamilton v. Patton Creamery Co.

However, the proximate cause need not be shown by direct and positive testimony, but may be shown by facts…

Watts v. Moussette

Instruction 3 clouded that issue and was misleading and confusing. Crowley v. Worthington, 71 S.W.2d 744;…