From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Majoros v. Collins

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 26, 1992
64 Ohio St. 3d 442 (Ohio 1992)

Summary

noting that "[w]e have consistently held that sentencing errors are not jurisdictional * * *."

Summary of this case from Peeks v. Sheets

Opinion

No. 91-2334

Submitted May 12, 1992 —

Decided August 26, 1992.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lorain County, No. 91CA005181.

On May 17, 1983, the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury returned a four-count indictment against appellant, Andrew Majoros. The counts included aggravated murder with firearm and death penalty specifications, aggravated robbery, and kidnapping. The Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County convicted the appellant of aggravated murder, kidnapping, and the gun specification and sentenced him to a term of thirty years to life imprisonment on the aggravated murder conviction, a concurrent term for kidnapping, and a three-year term of actual incarceration on the gun specification. Appellant is in the custody of Warden Terry L. Collins, appellee, at the Lorain Correctional Institute.

On August 30, 1991, appellant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Court of Appeals for Lorain County. The petition alleged that the court of common pleas violated the ex post facto provisions of R.C. 2929.61(D) by sentencing the appellant pursuant to a statute that was not effective at the time of his indictment. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the petition on the ground that a claim of sentencing errors is not cognizable in habeas corpus. The court of appeals granted the motion, holding that habeas corpus is not the proper remedy for reviewing errors in sentencing by a court of competent jurisdiction.

The cause is before this court upon an appeal as of right.

Andrew A. Majoros, pro se. Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and John J. Gideon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


We affirm the decision of the court of appeals. We have consistently held that sentencing errors are not jurisdictional and are not cognizable in habeas corpus. State ex rel. Wynn v. Baker (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 464, 575 N.E.2d 208; Blackburn v. Jago (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 139, 529 N.E.2d 929; Walker v. Maxwell (1965), 1 Ohio St.2d 136, 30 O.O.2d 487, 205 N.E.2d 394.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Majoros v. Collins

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 26, 1992
64 Ohio St. 3d 442 (Ohio 1992)

noting that "[w]e have consistently held that sentencing errors are not jurisdictional * * *."

Summary of this case from Peeks v. Sheets

sentencing errors are not jurisdictional

Summary of this case from State v. Harris

noting that "[w]e have consistently held that sentencing errors are not jurisdictional * * *."

Summary of this case from State v. Peeks
Case details for

Majoros v. Collins

Case Details

Full title:MAJOROS, APPELLANT, v. COLLINS, WARDEN, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Aug 26, 1992

Citations

64 Ohio St. 3d 442 (Ohio 1992)
596 N.E.2d 1038

Citing Cases

State v. Fischer

{¶ 7} The crux of our debate arises from the fact that in the normal course, sentencing errors are not…

State ex rel. Knuckles v. Lazaroff

Adams v. Humphreys (1986), 27 Ohio St.3d 43, 500 N.E.2d 1373. "Habeas corpus is not a proper remedy for…