From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL v. SED NON OLET

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 4, 1994
859 F. Supp. 80 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

Summary

rejecting an argument of intent to use where the plaintiffs "in no way demonstrated their intent to resume commercial use of the . . . mark within two years" of the original cessation of use

Summary of this case from Unuson Corporation v. Built Entertainment Group, Inc.

Opinion

No. 90 Civ. 2170 (CBM).

May 4, 1994.

ORDER VACATING ORDER AND JUDGMENT AND OPINION AND DISMISSING ACTION


Plaintiffs Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. and Los Angeles Dodgers, Inc. (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Sed Non Olet Denarius, Ltd., Bums, Inc., 9506, Inc., Dave Senatore, Richard Picardi, and Kevin F. Boyle (collectively, "Defendants"), having jointly moved this Court for an order vacating its Order and Judgment, entered June 8, 1993, and Opinion, dated April 6, 1993 (reported at 817 F. Supp. 1103 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)); it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the joint motion is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the Order and Judgment, entered June 8, 1993, and the Opinion, dated April 6, 1993, be and the same hereby are vacated; and it is further

ORDERED that the action is dismissed; and it is further

ORDERED that each party is to bear its own costs.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL v. SED NON OLET

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 4, 1994
859 F. Supp. 80 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

rejecting an argument of intent to use where the plaintiffs "in no way demonstrated their intent to resume commercial use of the . . . mark within two years" of the original cessation of use

Summary of this case from Unuson Corporation v. Built Entertainment Group, Inc.
Case details for

MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL v. SED NON OLET

Case Details

Full title:MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PROPERTIES, INC., and Los Angeles Dodgers, Inc.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 4, 1994

Citations

859 F. Supp. 80 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

Citing Cases

Unuson Corporation v. Built Entertainment Group, Inc.

Id. ¶ 8. Plaintiff's evidence is deficient because the alleged intent to continue use did not arise until…

Pebble Beach Co. v. Tour 18 I Limited

See, e.g., Indianapolis Colts, 34 F.3d at 415 (accepting a survey that asked if a party needed to get…