holding that there is no disparate impact liability under ADEA
Summary of this case from Browning v. Rohm & Haas Tennessee, Inc.No. 94-5111.
November 14, 1994
Appeal from and Citation (if reported) D.N.J., Gerry, J., 843 F.supp. 935
AFFIRMED
holding that there is no disparate impact liability under ADEA
Summary of this case from Browning v. Rohm & Haas Tennessee, Inc.finding that "other instruments" included information as to origin of current monthly benefit
Summary of this case from Hess v. Hartford Insuranceconstruing §§ 1025 and 1024(b) together
Summary of this case from Bilello v. Jpmorgan Chase Retirement Planrefusing to recognize disparate impact under the ADEA
Summary of this case from Duffy v. HalterFull title:Maiuro v. Federal Express Corp
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Date published: Nov 14, 1994
McDonough v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc., No. 09-571 SRC, 2011 WL 4455994, at *7…
Williams v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Health & Mental HygieneGiven those undisputed facts, Williams's proposed accommodation was not reasonable as a matter of law. See,…