From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mainor v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 29, 1977
348 So. 2d 1091 (Ala. 1977)

Opinion

SC 2598.

July 29, 1977.

Appeal from the Montgomery County Circuit Court, Frank B. Embry, Special Judge.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Joseph G.L. Marston, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Bob E. Allen, Montgomery, for respondent.


In denying this writ, we do not wish to be considered as agreeing fully with the statement of the Court of Criminal Appeals which classified the references to the earlier shooting as immaterial. The state's evidence to the effect that defendant had shot into the house earlier appears to have been improper rebuttal. Had this evidence been offered in the state's case in brief, however, it may have been relevant and material either on the issue of identity or to negate accident. If the case is retried, we do not apprehend that the prosecution will confuse the applicable rules of substantive evidence with those governing impeachment by proof of a prior self-contradictory statement.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, FAULKNER and BEATTY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mainor v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 29, 1977
348 So. 2d 1091 (Ala. 1977)
Case details for

Mainor v. State

Case Details

Full title:In re Jessie Lee MAINOR, alias v. STATE. Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel…

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jul 29, 1977

Citations

348 So. 2d 1091 (Ala. 1977)

Citing Cases

Leu v. City of Mountain Brook

Substantial evidence of every element of the charged offense was presented by the City and, therefore, the…

Boykin v. State

Consequently, the trial court properly overruled the defendant's motion to exclude. Mainor v. State,…