Summary
concluding that the petitioner provided no evidence or legal argument that demonstrated that post-removal-order release under an order of supervision violated due process and noting that in Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 696, the Supreme Court explicitly held that release on conditions is the appropriate alternative to detention
Summary of this case from Sayonkon v. BenieckeOpinion
Civil No. 05-900 (DWF/FLN).
May 1, 2006
Herbert A. Igbanugo, Esq., Blackwell Igbanugo PA, counsel for Petitioner.
D. Gerald Wilhelm, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, counsel for Respondents.
ORDER
Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated March 29, 2006, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.