In Maguire v. Selden (103 N.Y. 642) it was said: "An estoppel may not be based upon statements made to a third person, and not made to be communicated to the one claiming the estoppel."
Summary of this case from Empire Manufacturing Co. v. MoersArgued June 22, 1886
Decided October 5, 1886
Benjamin Estes for appellants.
Charles J. Patterson for respondent.
DANFORTH, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Maguire v. Selden (103 N.Y. 642) it was said: "An estoppel may not be based upon statements made to a third person, and not made to be communicated to the one claiming the estoppel."
Summary of this case from Empire Manufacturing Co. v. MoersFull title:MARY MAGUIRE as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v . GEORGE SELDEN et…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 5, 1886
This case presents as to the proposed pleading, practically the interposition of "an inaccurate statement" by…
McLaren v. JonesOne who hears of the declarations of another, not made to him nor intended to be communicated to him, cannot…