From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magid v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1932
182 N.E. 206 (N.Y. 1932)

Opinion

Submitted May 13, 1932

Decided June 2, 1932

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Arthur J.W. Hilly, Corporation Counsel ( Milton I. Hauser, Louis Diamant and J. Joseph Lilly of counsel), for The City of New York, appellant.

Frank M. Wilcox and Clarence E. Mellen for Garhill Realty Corporation, appellant.

Bernard Gordon for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ.


Summaries of

Magid v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1932
182 N.E. 206 (N.Y. 1932)
Case details for

Magid v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS MAGID, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 2, 1932

Citations

182 N.E. 206 (N.Y. 1932)
182 N.E. 206

Citing Cases

Rhabb v. New York City Housing Authority

ch use is likely to be continued, the municipality may not ignore the foreseeable dangers, continue to extend…

Weber v. City of New York

The lapse of time during which it was used by the city, could fairly create the presumption of actual notice…