From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madrigal v. Cates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 16, 2014
Case No. CV 13-560 PA (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-560 PA (MRW)

06-16-2014

PEDRO MADRIGAL, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATES, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

__________

HON. PERCY ANDERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Madrigal v. Cates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 16, 2014
Case No. CV 13-560 PA (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2014)
Case details for

Madrigal v. Cates

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO MADRIGAL, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATES, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 16, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 13-560 PA (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2014)

Citing Cases

Wood v. Reynolds

Guilt by association, however, is not a freestanding claim and instead is generally considered in relation to…